Log in

View Full Version : "That will be $250m. Plus interest, please"



Ben
30th December 2005, 01:22 AM
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/12/29/interdigital_wins_nokia_patent_dispute/


A US federal judge yesterday confirmed that Nokia must cough up $232-$252m in disputed patent royalties to InterDigital.

Nokia had contested the decision made by in June 2005 by the International Court of Arbitration that it should pay InterDigital this amount in royalties on GSM handsets and network equipment sold between 2002 and 2006.

Following the US court's ruling that it must pay in full the amount determined by arbitrators, Nokia's room for manoeuvre looks decidedly limited. The company is to examine the possibility of appeal and notes that Interdigital has expressed willingness to negotiate over the money it must pay. But it is difficult to see this as anything other than a comprehensive defeat for the handset maker. Oh, and it has to pay interest too.

Now for an un-canned quote from William Merrit, InterDigital's CEO:

"We have always believed that any challenge to the Final Award would ultimately fail. In rejecting all of Nokia's arguments, the federal court confirmed our belief. With yet another legal challenge dismissed, we are hopeful that Nokia will finally comply with its signed license agreement with InterDigital. If not, we will continue to pursue all legal remedies to secure payment. In that vein, as we announced yesterday, we have taken action to utilize the contractual dispute resolution process with Nokia in order to accelerate the resolution of any outstanding issues that Nokia might allege. We remain confident that Nokia will pay the amounts due."

Ouch.

Hands0n
30th December 2005, 07:45 AM
Ouch, indeed!

Next in line to give Nokia a kicking appears Qualcomm vis a vis its UMTS lincencing.

What is going on? Is Nokia that lackadaisical with its administration of contractual agreements? Or is the US being its usual protectionist self against anything and everything outside of its shores?

Can Nokia sustain such heavy drains on its finances? Or is it likely to have insurance against such events?

There really appears to be something very wrong in that particular department. Perhaps a few good high profile and very humiliating sackings would help keep their contracts team on focus!

Edit: A couple of stories about [apparently highly litigious] Qualcomm's disputes with Nokia
Qualcomm slaps Nokia with GSM patent suit - http://www.computing.co.uk/vnunet/news/2145671/qualcomm-accuses-nokia-gsm?vnu_lt=ctg_art_related_articles

Nokia 'stunned' by Qualcomm legal assault - http://www.computing.co.uk/vnunet/news/2145708/nokia-stunned-qualcomm-legal

By way of an aside - yet further interesting reading about Qualcomm and the manufacturers - Industry giants slam 'anti-competitive' Qualcomm -> http://www.computing.co.uk/vnunet/news/2145081/broadcom-ericsson-nec-nokia

Imagine a world without 3G, did Qualcomm sucker the entire planet?

Ben
30th December 2005, 11:53 AM
"Or is the US being its usual protectionist self against anything and everything outside of its shores?"
I mean, of course, if Nokia have made some big mistakes leaving them open to such heavy litigation then that's their own problem. I bet they're wishing they'd stayed well clear of the Moto States of America now... The money involved just seems so OTT.