Log in

View Full Version : 3G iPhone in 2008 says Apple and AT&T



Hands0n
30th November 2007, 11:11 PM
Well one can only hope, speculate or both :)

Article Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103


Apple Inc. will introduce a version of the iPhone next year that can download from the Internet at a faster rate, AT&T Inc. Chief Executive Officer Randall Stephenson said.

The device will operate on third-generation wireless networks, Stephenson said today at a meeting of the Churchill Club in Santa Clara, California. San Antonio-based AT&T is the exclusive carrier for the iPhone in the U.S.

``You'll have it next year,'' Stephenson said in response to a question about when the 3G iPhone would debut. He said he didn't know how much more the new version will cost than the existing model, which sells for $399. Apple Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs ``will dictate what the price of the phone is,'' he said.

Jobs plans to sell 10 million iPhones worldwide in 2008, which would give Cupertino, California-based Apple 1 percent of the mobile-phone market. Apple had sold 1.4 million handsets through the end of September.

The prospect of a new handset may make some shoppers put off buying an iPhone this year, Gene Munster, an analyst with Piper Jaffray & Co. in Minneapolis, said in an e-mail. The number of shoppers who delay a purchase won't be ``enough to make a difference,'' he said. Munster has advised buying Apple shares since June 2004.

The device, which combines features of an iPod music player with a mobile handset, can download videos from Google Inc.'s YouTube and find driving directions over a wireless connection. Apple spokeswoman Natalie Kerris declined to comment.

Battery Life

Jobs said in September that the iPhone's battery life would be too short if it supported faster networks. The handset has eight hours of battery life, and 3G chips are ``real power hogs,'' he said at a news conference in London.

``We've got to see the battery lives for 3G get back up into the five-plus-hour range,'' he said. ``Hopefully we'll see that late next year.''

AT&T, owner of the largest U.S. mobile-phone service, is using the iPhone to lure customers from its closest rival, Verizon Wireless, which announced a plan this week to open its network to any phone or software maker that meets technical specifications.

Stephenson called the Verizon Wireless plan ``overblown.'' ``The industry's headed that way,'' he said. ``We are probably one of the most open networks in the world, not just the U.S.''

Thousands of developers create features for AT&T's network, and consumers can buy phones at the full price if they don't want to buy a subsidized model and sign a contract to use the company's wireless service, Stephenson said.

AT&T also continues to have confidence in its strategy to offer television service over its phone lines, Stephenson said. Eventually, the company could offer TV to the ``lion's share'' of the 30 million homes in its territory, a goal that could take ``a while,'' he said. ``We can keep pushing this technology further and further out to rural America.'' he said.

Stephenson plans to make the TV service available to 8 million homes by the end of this year and 17 million by the end of 2008. The company offers satellite service from EchoStar Communications Corp. and DirecTV Group Inc. in areas it doesn't reach with its own TV plan.

Offering satellite will be ``a long-term solution until we can get the video built out in those areas,'' Stephenson said.


Seriously, if the 3G 3 Skypephone can manage an entire day of reasonable use on 3G and 2G (switching as you go) then I see no reason why a modern-day 3G handset cannot match that little £49.95 wonder of Chinese engineering. Or are the Americans not as sophisticated as the Chinese at design and manufacturing these days? :D

gorilla
1st December 2007, 10:57 AM
Thems fighting words
Or are the Americans not as sophisticated as the Chinese at design and manufacturing these days? and we all know the yanks love a good battle but have they ever actually won one?

A 3g iphone next year would fit nicely into Apples upgrade pattern. Who wants one ;)

Now then, wouldn't it be advisable to have a 3g network in place to support such a device?

Ben
1st December 2007, 11:11 AM
A 3G iPhone goes a long way towards me owning one, but I also want MMS and better SMS standards compatibility would be nice. So, we'll see :D

I certainly think there's a chance a 3G iPhone will go to another network in the UK... but then if O2's deal includes 3G handsets then I'm not so sure. Why would O2 have bothered with an EDGE deployment if a 3G iPhone was only 6 months away? They'd hardly get a return on their investment... so perhaps more 2G versions are in the pipeline also :S

Either that or O2's 3G rollout will go crazy after Christmas.

Hands0n
1st December 2007, 01:52 PM
I remain sceptical that Apple with change the SMS paradigm very much, if at all. It is designed very much as eye candy, and in an IM Chat style complete with word baloons. How the hell you change this to operate more like regular SMS clients remains a challenge. Maybe they need a new client and just rename the incumbent SMS Chat (rather like some mobiles have).

Adding an MMS client or function should not be too much of a challenge to a developer.

But the million-dollar question is whether Apple will address the, largely European, concerns or not. Do Apple intend to impose on the rest of Planet Earth the American model of mobile handset? Unfortunately [for Apple] we, the buying public, have absolute choice and this time round we seem to have largely shown that we are prepared to invoke it. Apple's sales of the iPhone are lacklustre in the UK at least - and that seems to be repeated elsewhere in Europe.

So Apple's dilemma is whether or not they bend to Europe which is already very much richer in 3G than their domestic market.

3g-g
1st December 2007, 02:34 PM
I think Apple would be stupid not to adopt a 3G handset tailored for the European market, it should be quite obvious to them how much more advanced the EU mobile telephony market is over the US, and to run an Americanised device hoping for the same impact as back home makes them look substandard IMHO.

With the European Nokias and Far East Samsungs staring to make very pretty small, 3.5G handsets with huge feature listings Apple (innovators or simplicity and productivity with their HW and SW) can't be seen to be the fat American that thinks there is no other world outside of it's borders.

If Apple don't cater for the EU UMTS market, and the wider GSM adopting countries I could see them becoming another Motorola.

Hands0n
1st December 2007, 02:55 PM
If Apple don't cater for the EU UMTS market........ I could see them becoming another Motorola.

Quite so :eek: And, like Motorola, they wouldn't necessarily understand why. The American psyche is an odd fish - behaving like a 4-year old child, it often is truly amazed that it could be considered not 100% right all of the time.

Its almost a complete belief system!