Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Ofcom updates 4G auction proposals

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Wilt's Avatar
    Wilt
    Wilt is offlineRegular Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Coppull/Hull
    Posts
    204

    Default

    The only issue with the 'not spot' route, is how do you define a 'not spot'? Or perhaps more importantly, who will be defining it?

    Will it be the operator? In which case, are they only going to go as far as providing a token effort then giving up when the £150million is exhausted?

    Or are Ofcom going to try and do it? Are they even allowed to tell a private company where they must place resources?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Canterbury, Kent
    Posts
    9,482
    Blog Entries
    111

    Default

    That's the thing, I don't think it specifies, at least not in the news reports. If Ofcom specifies the areas that must be covered then we should be ok.

    I think Germany did a similar thing and it worked really well. At the end of the day, if the condition is only tied to one license then there's no obligation on any private company to bid for it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Norf Kent
    Posts
    8,164
    Blog Entries
    13

    Default

    This is a good plan, generally. The only thing is that the networks must not be permitted to cause any further delays. We are already 18 - 24 months behind the rest of Europe!

  4. #4
    gorilla's Avatar
    gorilla
    gorilla is offline@iChrisTaylor
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Belfast
    Posts
    1,495

    Default

    The level of coverage is always going to be contentious, particularly in the more rural regions.
    As Hands0n says above, this needs to be sorted quickly. My home broadband is going to be 100Mbps by the time I get 4G (and maybe faster if I pay for it) so the mobile operators will need to be competing with that, otherwise what is the point?
    At the minute I'd take getting 3G everywhere, not just in rural areas but within buildings.

    What is happening to 2G (GSM?) when we finally get 4G?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Canterbury, Kent
    Posts
    9,482
    Blog Entries
    111

    Default

    QuoteOriginally Posted by gorilla View Post
    What is happening to 2G (GSM?) when we finally get 4G?
    I think there'll be thin GSM coverage around for some time yet. I'm not sure how it works technically, but I think it can hang on even with WCDMA slowly encroaching on its territory.

  6. #6
    hecatae's Avatar
    hecatae
    hecatae is offlineTalk3G Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Northampton
    Posts
    1,053
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    so would we see 2G + 3G + 4G sim cards or do you think we will see 3G + 4G only sim cards?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Canterbury, Kent
    Posts
    9,482
    Blog Entries
    111

    Default

    I predict that SIMs will allow access to all technologies, and that support will instead depend on handset for the time being. That's only a personal prediction, though.

    I think there's the potential to see networks granting LTE-only access on consumer tariffs once coverage is sufficient. But most if not all GSM networks in the UK will need to maintain GSM capabilities for some time yet if only to support deployed M2M solutions (things like chip-and-pin machines are still being sold on 2G now), so I'm not sure they'll be fussed about it.

    I'm not sure what the issue was when 3G launched. Part of it seemed to be about supplying more capable SIM cards (perhaps there were security implications), but part of it also seemed to be about restricting access to the new network, trying to retain some level of control initially until all the kinks were worked out.

  8. #8
    Wilt's Avatar
    Wilt
    Wilt is offlineRegular Poster
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Coppull/Hull
    Posts
    204

    Default

    QuoteOriginally Posted by Hands0n View Post
    This is a good plan, generally. The only thing is that the networks must not be permitted to cause any further delays. We are already 18 - 24 months behind the rest of Europe!
    True, although the spectrum isn't available yet anyway so I don't think the auction delay will push back actual roll-out by too much. I would assume all of the networks will be planning how they're going to roll out LTE based upon what spectrum allocation they anticipate getting.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •